My Bitcoin Presentation


Here’s an AI summary of the bitcoin presentaiton I’ve given 2x now and am set to give agian in the future. You can find the video here.

1. The Problem: Broken Money

  • Money is supposed to store value from your labor, but inflation erodes that value over time.
  • Fiat money used to be backed by gold until 1971; now it’s backed by government trust and military power (“money backed by bombs”).
  • Governments print trillions, causing inflation and currency devaluation.
  • Inflation isn’t caused by parties or policies — it’s caused by money printing.
  • History (Roman Empire, etc.) shows debasing currency leads to collapse.

2. The Solution: Bitcoin

  • Fixed supply: 21 million coins — no one can print more.
  • Divisible: Each Bitcoin has 100 million satoshis (smallest unit).
  • Scarcity = preserved value.
  • Blockchain: Decentralized public ledger validating transactions without banks.
  • Mining: Miners verify transactions, earn fees, and newly unlocked Bitcoin (currently 3.125 BTC every ~10 minutes).

3. Why Bitcoin Is Unique

  • Fair launch: No pre-mine or early insider advantage; Satoshi mined alongside others.
  • Other coins (altcoins): Often pre-mined, centrally controlled, and solve fake problems — more like unregistered securities.
  • Bitcoin solves one problem — store of value.

4. How to Buy Bitcoin

  • Easiest: Through Bitcoin ETFs on Fidelity, Schwab (not Vanguard).
  • Direct ownership: Strike, River, or Cash App (low fees, only Bitcoin).
  • Avoid: Apps like Robinhood, PayPal, Coinbase — too many distracting altcoins.

5. Future Potential & Valuation

  • Total global assets ≈ $750 trillion; “monetary premium” (store-of-value demand) ≈ $273 trillion.
  • If Bitcoin absorbs that, price = ~$13 million per BTC.
  • At $100,000 today, even small investments could have massive upside (e.g., $10k → $1.3M).
  • Volatile, but long-term risk/reward is asymmetric.

6. Adoption Trends

  • Governments adopting: El Salvador (legal tender), Bhutan, Pakistan, some U.S. states (Texas, NH, Arizona).
  • Companies holding Bitcoin: Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), Tesla, Block, Marathon, Coinbase, etc.
  • U.S. forming a “Bitcoin strategic reserve.”

7. Final Takeaways

  • Fiat money causes many global problems; Bitcoin fixes the root issue — sound money.
  • Start small, invest what you can afford to lose.
  • Learn more and grow your understanding — treat dips as opportunities.
  • Key message: Broken money → broken world. Bitcoin → fixed money → potential for a better system.

Is Bitcoin a Ponzi Scheme?

People often ask me that question when I’m giving a bitcoin presentation or just talking about it one on one. The comparison comes up because Bitcoin is new, people don’t understand it, it has gone up a lot in value, and skeptics assume that must mean someone is being tricked. But to answer it clearly, we need to define what a Ponzi actually is.

A Ponzi scheme is a fraud where early participants are paid “returns” using money from later participants. There’s no productive asset behind it—just cash shuffling from newcomers to old-timers until the inflows slow down and the scheme collapses. Hallmarks of a Ponzi are:

  • Promised guaranteed returns regardless of the market.
  • No underlying value creation.
  • Dependence on new entrants to keep funding old ones.

By that definition, Bitcoin simply doesn’t fit. Bitcoin doesn’t promise anyone a return. It doesn’t pay holders just for owning it. There is no central operator taking money from new buyers to pay old ones. Instead, Bitcoin is an open, neutral monetary network. Its value is set transparently by the market. People buy it because they believe in its properties—scarcity, portability, censorship resistance—not because they’re promised payouts.

Ironically, the system that does mirror a Ponzi structure is Social Security. Today’s workers don’t have their contributions saved for their own retirement. Their payroll taxes are immediately used to pay current retirees. The system only holds up as long as new workers keep entering to fund those already drawing benefits. In other words:

  • New entrants (workers) pay.
  • Old entrants (retirees) benefit.

That is the definition of a Ponzi-like structure. And unlike Bitcoin, which can run indefinitely on code and math, Social Security’s days are limited. Demographics are shifting—fewer young workers, more retirees—and that math simply doesn’t work forever. The only thing keeping it afloat today is government borrowing and taxation authority.

👉 Bottom line: Bitcoin is not a Ponzi. It’s voluntary, transparent, and sustainable. Social Security, on the other hand, is the true Ponzi—and its expiration date is nearing!

How Long Can You Ignore Bitcoin?

Bitcoin doesn’t need you. But maybe—just maybe—you need Bitcoin.

Every cycle, new people show up thinking they’ve discovered something revolutionary—whether it’s questioning Bitcoin’s energy use, proposing faster payment layers, or trying to “fix” volatility. But every idea you’ve had about Bitcoin… has already been debated, attacked, memed, improved, or discarded years ago. The Bitcoin rabbit hole is deep, and it’s been dug for over 15 years by some of the most paranoid, visionary, and relentless minds on the planet.

Bitcoin isn’t some niche internet plaything anymore. It’s now held on balance sheets, integrated into national energy grids, and embedded in the financial strategies of countries and corporations alike. And yet, most people still ignore it—until they can’t.

How long can you ignore a monetary network that’s eating inflation, resisting censorship, and refusing to die?

Bitcoin doesn’t wait. It doesn’t care if you “believe” in it. It just keeps producing blocks every 10 minutes, no matter what. The longer you delay engaging with it, the more ground you lose—not just financially, but intellectually. Because by the time you show up with your “fresh” take, there’s already a thousand-page thread archived on Bitcointalk dismantling it.

Bitcoin doesn’t need you. But maybe—just maybe—you need Bitcoin.


🧠 Common Questions (Yes, They’ve Already Been Answered)

Before you leave a comment or dismiss Bitcoin entirely, check below—your question has probably been asked, answered, and refined for years. But if it hasn’t, ask! The Bitcoin rabbit hole only gets deeper when you engage.

🔒 1. What about quantum computing?

Won’t it break Bitcoin?


⚡ 2. Why is Bitcoin so slow and expensive?

Visa is faster. Why would I use this?


🌱 3. Isn’t Bitcoin bad for the environment?

It uses more energy than countries!


📉 4. Isn’t Bitcoin too volatile to be money?

I can’t buy groceries with it!


🪙 5. Can’t someone just make a better Bitcoin?

Isn’t tech supposed to improve over time?


🧠 6. Isn’t this all just speculative gambling?

Feels like tulips and meme coins.


💬 Got More Questions?

Drop them in the comments or send me a message—I’m always open to honest discussion. But I strongly encourage you to do a little digging first. Chances are, someone’s already asked your exact question… and the answer is better than you’d expect.

Start here. Stay curious. See where it leads. 🟠

Bitcoin Is Not an Investment — It’s a Revolution (Synthesis of Jack Mallers’ Talk at Bitcoin Prague 2025)

🎯 Final Word: Choose Ethical Money

Bitcoin is not just about beating inflation or outperforming Wall Street.
It’s about dignity. It’s about sovereignty.
It’s about creating a world where value can’t be stolen.

So the next time someone asks what Bitcoin is, tell them this:

It’s not an investment. It’s a revolution.

Why the youth are turning to math instead of politicians to fix what was broken before they were born.

“If we could just print money, why is there poverty, war, and hunger?”
— Jack Mallers


👋 Jack Mallers Is Saying What I’ve Been Trying to Say

Every once in a while, someone steps up and articulates your beliefs more clearly, more passionately, and more publicly than you could yourself.

That’s what Jack Mallers did in his recent keynote.
He didn’t just explain Bitcoin — he captured the emotional, moral, and generational reasons I’ve written about on my blog:

We aren’t just investing in Bitcoin.
We’re opting out of a broken system.
We’re building something better.

If you’ve read my post “Why I Support Bitcoin: A Personal Journey Through the Global Failure of Fiat”, you know I believe the fiat money system is robbing our generation of hope, stability, and purpose. Mallers echoes that — and then takes it even further.

This summary breaks down his talk. It’s one of the clearest cases I’ve seen for Bitcoin as a moral revolution, not a financial asset.


🧠 Mallers’ Core Thesis: Bitcoin Is a Moral Revolution

Not a speculative asset. Not a tech fad. Not a hedge fund toy.

🧨 Bitcoin is an ethical, generational response to a broken fiat system that’s hollowed out society.


🚨 A Generation in Crisis

Millennials and Gen Z were told to go to college — and walked away with six-figure debt.
We were told the economy is booming — while we’re priced out of homes.
We were told to “just work hard” — while real wages stagnate and healthcare bankrupts families.

The data speaks volumes:

  • Youth suicide and overdose deaths are rising.
  • Obesity, divorce, and depression all spike post-1971 — the year the U.S. left the gold standard.
  • Young adults living with parents now exceeds levels from the Great Depression.

This is not normal. And deep down, we all know it.


🏦 The System Was Designed to Exploit

Jack Mallers walks us through the rot:

  • Bretton Woods (1944): U.S. dollar is pegged to gold.
  • Nixon Shock (1971): That peg is severed. Money becomes paper.
  • Petrodollar (1974): The dollar’s global dominance is enforced by oil deals and military might.

The U.S. prints money. The world ships us real goods.
We don’t produce — we consume.
We don’t export labor — we export inflation, instability, and war.

“Fiat currency is a moral violation,” Mallers says. “It’s time travel. You’re spending your kids’ future without their consent.”


⚖️ The Triffin Dilemma: Why the Middle Class Had to Die

Economist Robert Triffin warned that a nation with the global reserve currency must choose between:

  • Domestic stability
  • Global demand

America chose global demand.

The result?
We shipped jobs overseas.
We poisoned our food.
We hollowed out our towns and our families.
We replaced meaningful work with dependency — then blamed the poor for being poor.

And it was on purpose.

“They knew,” Mallers reminds us. “This wasn’t an accident. It was the cost of empire.”


⚰️ 50 Years of Consequences

Mallers lays it out plainly: when you debase money, you debase everything else.

  • 📉 Wages stagnated while assets inflated.
  • 🍔 Diets worsened as processed food replaced real nutrition.
  • 💊 Mental health and family formation collapsed.
  • 🧱 Hard work stopped paying off.

“All of this started in 1971,” he says again and again. “That’s weird, isn’t it?”


🔐 Bitcoin: A Peaceful Revolution Built on Math

Against this backdrop, Bitcoin isn’t just a shiny asset — it’s a moral tool.

It’s a response to a system built on theft, control, and decay.

Bitcoin’s moral code:

  • You shall not inflate.
  • You shall not confiscate.
  • You shall not censor.
  • You shall not counterfeit.

Unlike fiat, Bitcoin is enforced by math, not military.
Private keys are stronger than guns.
You can steal a house. You can loot a bank.
But you can’t steal 256-bit encryption locked in someone’s mind.

“Bitcoiners are Bitcoin,” Mallers says. “Before it’s a network, it’s a movement. Before it’s code, it’s ethics.”


💡 The Future Isn’t Given — It’s Built

We didn’t ask for this system.
We didn’t choose to be born into debt and decay.
But we get to choose what comes next.

Bitcoin is the latest chapter in the story of human innovation.
Like fire, the printing press, the computer — it’s a tool to reclaim our agency.
It lets us opt out of a system that exploits us and build one based on fairness and freedom.

“After you wipe your last tear,” Mallers asks, “what do you want to do?”


🎯 Final Word: Choose Ethical Money

Bitcoin is not just about beating inflation or outperforming Wall Street.
It’s about dignity. It’s about sovereignty.
It’s about creating a world where value can’t be stolen.

So the next time someone asks what Bitcoin is, tell them this:

It’s not an investment. It’s a revolution.

Join the Revolution!

Stablecoins: The Offshore Demand Engine for a Decaying Fiscal Regime

Over the last decade, stablecoins have quietly grown from a crypto curiosity into a multi-hundred-billion-dollar shadow banking system. Pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed largely by short-term U.S. Treasury debt, they serve as the grease in the wheels of global crypto markets, offshore exchanges, and dollar-hungry economies.

But beneath the surface, something much bigger is happening.


The Dollar Finds a New Buyer

Traditionally, U.S. Treasuries—the lifeblood of American government spending—have been snapped up by major institutions: foreign governments (like China and Japan), domestic banks, and pension funds. But in recent years, these traditional buyers have pulled back. Geopolitical tensions, rising debt levels, and concerns over inflation have made U.S. debt less attractive, even as the U.S. continues running multi-trillion dollar deficits.

Enter the stablecoin.

Today, companies like Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) hold tens of billions of dollars in U.S. government debt to back their tokens. When someone in Argentina, Nigeria, or a Binance trading desk mints USDT, they’re not just getting a “digital dollar”—they’re triggering a real-world Treasury purchase. The crypto user thinks they’re opting out of the fiat system. But in reality, they’re becoming its final buyer.


The Crypto User Thinks They’re Opting Out of the Fiat System

Why do people in Argentina, Turkey, Lebanon, or Nigeria rush to buy USDT?

Because their own currencies are collapsing. Hyperinflation, capital controls, corrupt central banks—these people aren’t speculating; they’re fleeing. To them, the U.S. dollar—even in stablecoin form—is a lifeline. A way to store value. A way to escape the chaos of their local monetary regimes.

But here’s the catch:

They think they’re opting out of fiat. But in reality, they’re just opting into a slightly better fiat—one that’s still built on debt, political manipulation, and unsustainable spending.

The stablecoin looks like freedom. It feels like safety. But under the hood, it’s still backed by U.S. government debt, not hard money.

Ironically, while individuals are rushing into dollars, governments and central banks are quietly opting outdumping Treasuries and buying gold. China, Russia, and other major players are de-dollarizing their reserves, building gold stacks instead of paper promises.

So while everyday people buy USDT thinking they’re escaping a broken system, they’re actually becoming the last line of support for it.


A Bad Deal for the User, A Great Deal for the Issuer

This system is not just ironic—it’s rigged.

When a user buys a stablecoin, they hand over real money (often hard-earned in volatile, inflation-ridden economies) and receive a token that loses value over time. Meanwhile, the stablecoin issuer uses that cash to buy U.S. Treasuries yielding 5%, pocketing the interest for themselves.

It’s a classic arbitrage:

The company gets the yield. The user gets the illusion of stability.

And what does the company do with the profits?

Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, has been using its surplus to buy Bitcoin and gold.
Yes—they are converting fiat yield into hard assets while their users hold yieldless tokens that depreciate.

Stablecoins aren’t neutral tools—they’re a form of rent extraction on unequal access to dollars. The poor and marginalized, locked out of the global banking system, pay the premium. They provide the capital, but don’t share in the returns. It’s dollar apartheid dressed up as digital liberation.

Ironically, while the wealthy and powerful are exiting Treasuries and moving into gold, the global poor are herded into yieldless tokens that prop up a collapsing system—tokens whose issuers are quietly stacking Bitcoin behind the scenes.


Exit Liquidity for the Empire of Debt

Here’s the twist: stablecoin users—retail traders, global remitters, DeFi participants—are providing exit liquidity for traditional U.S. Treasury holders.

As old institutions reduce exposure to U.S. debt, stablecoin issuers step in, fueled by global crypto demand. The American government still gets to sell its debt. But the buyer has changed. The new buyer is a protocol, backed by offshore exchanges, remittance flows, and millions of anonymous wallets.

This system works—until it doesn’t.


When the Music Stops

What happens in the next crypto bear market? What happens if regulators crack down on stablecoins? If demand for stablecoins dries up, the artificial demand for Treasuries does too. The U.S. government will have to find new buyers—or offer much higher interest rates.

That’s the risk of this hidden system: a shadow Treasury market tied to the most volatile and politically uncertain asset class on earth.


The Ironic Truth

Crypto was born to escape fiat. But stablecoins—its most widely used product—are deeply tied to the health of the fiat regime. They don’t disrupt the dollar. They extend its life. They distribute it further. They help the empire keep borrowing.

In this light, stablecoins aren’t just a tool for freedom. They’re also a backdoor bailout for a bloated fiscal machine, enabled by the very people it exploits.

And if that’s true, the real question isn’t whether the U.S. dollar will survive—but how long crypto will prop it up… while its issuers quietly prepare for the next system.


💡 Want to understand the global mechanics behind this better?
Look up The Dollar Milkshake Theory by Brent Johnson.
It explains how a structurally flawed but globally dominant dollar continues to suck in capital from weaker economies—even as the system cracks.

💵 Dollars Are Just Fancy Scrip

Why real freedom starts with escaping centralized money


Most people think money is neutral. You earn it, you spend it, you save it. Simple. But what if the money in your wallet isn’t really yours? What if it works more like company scrip than true, independent money?

Let’s take a step back in time — and a step deeper into the system we live in.


🏭 Company Scrip: The Original Trap

In mining and lumber towns of the 19th and early 20th century, companies often paid workers in “scrip” — private money usable only at the company store.

  • Could you spend it elsewhere? Nope.
  • Could you build wealth? Not easily.
  • Were prices fair? Absolutely not.

It was a closed-loop system. One that looked like money, but ultimately existed to control labor and consumption.


🏛️ Fiat Currency: The Scrip Goes National

Now look at the dollar, the rupee, the euro.

These are government-issued fiat currencies. But just like scrip:

  • They’re created at will by central banks.
  • They lose value over time through inflation.
  • They’re political tools, subject to manipulation and control.
  • And they limit your economic choices to within a system you didn’t design.

It’s still scrip — just at scale. You’re still in the company town. The company just got a flag and a central bank.


🪙 Bitcoin, Gold, and Financial Exit

Real money — money that promotes freedom — should be:

  • Scarce
  • Neutral
  • Borderless
  • Independent of politics

That’s why people turn to Bitcoin and gold. They’re not controlled by anyone, and that matters.

When your wealth is stored in something you control, your freedom becomes harder to take away.


⚠️ The Real Issue: Agency

The bigger point isn’t about currencies.
It’s about control.

Whoever controls your money controls your choices.

If a central bank, a political party, or a single institution can dilute or freeze your money — you don’t own your life. Not really.

Financial agency isn’t just a luxury. It’s a requirement for freedom.


🧠 Final Thought

So yes, your dollars function. But they’re not neutral. They’re managed, manipulated, and diluted — all without your consent.

They’re just fancy scrip — and you don’t own the store.

Study Bitcoin!

What Is Money, Really? A Fresh Look at Why Bitcoin Matters

💡 Money Isn’t What You Think It Is

Most of us think of money as the bills in our wallets or numbers in our bank accounts. But money isn’t a physical thing—it’s a system of IOUs. It’s how we track value we’ve created, whether that’s building a fence, baking bread, or writing software.

Here’s the key insight: money itself doesn’t hold value.
If it did, you’d want to hoard it. But you don’t. You probably try to get rid of your dollars by putting them into stocks, real estate, or gold—anything to escape inflation.


🧱 A Story About a Fence (and a Broken System)

Imagine this:
You build a 100-foot fence for someone. They pay you $100. One year later, you ask them to build a fence for you. They say, “Sure, but now it’ll cost $105.”

Why? Inflation. Your money didn’t hold its value. The effort you gave last year is worth less this year.

And while the U.S. has “low” inflation, other countries—like Argentina—see 100% inflation annually. In places like that, people rush to convert their paychecks into food, bricks, or U.S. dollars just to preserve value.

But let’s be honest: the U.S. dollar and Argentine peso aren’t fundamentally different. Both are government-issued currencies that lose value over time due to overspending and excessive money printing.


⚙️ Enter Bitcoin: Fixed, Transparent, and Decentralized

Bitcoin was designed to fix this exact problem.

  • There will only ever be 21 million bitcoins.
  • Each one can be divided into 100 million sats (Satoshis).
  • Bitcoin is basically a global, digital IOU ledger that nobody controls—but everyone can verify.

Think of it as an open-source Excel spreadsheet that tracks who owns what. But instead of one person controlling it, thousands of computers (nodes) maintain the same list and agree on changes only when a valid transaction is made.


🔨 How Bitcoin Transactions Work

  1. You send a transaction using your app or wallet.
  2. It enters the mempool, a kind of digital waiting room.
  3. Miners select and bundle transactions into a block.
  4. They solve a math puzzle to earn the right to add the block to the chain.
  5. Once added, it’s permanent—and verified by the entire network.

Each block takes about 10 minutes to process. Miners are rewarded with both newly “unlocked” bitcoin (currently 3.125 BTC) and small transaction fees—typically less than 1%, cheaper than credit cards.


🆚 Bitcoin vs “Altcoins”

Bitcoin has no premine, meaning the creator didn’t secretly give themselves coins before anyone else could buy them. Most altcoins (alternative cryptocurrencies) do. That makes many of them less like open money and more like disguised businesses.

Ask yourself: What real problem is this altcoin solving?

The answer is likely that the coin is built around a company structure, because it can’t solve the store of value problem. Bitcoin already solved that problem.


💸 How to Buy Bitcoin Today

Option 1: Brokerages

  • Buy FBTC, the Fidelity Bitcoin Trust, just like a stock or ETF
  • Available through Fidelity, Schwab, and others
  • Small fee: ~0.25% expense ratio

Option 2: Direct Purchase

  • Use apps like Strike, River, or Cash App
  • You can hold your own Bitcoin (self-custody) or keep it with the app

📈 Why Bitcoin Could Hit $13 Million

There are $750 trillion in global assets.

Asset CategoryEstimated Value (USD)
Real estate~$360 trillion
Equities (stocks)~$110 trillion
Bonds (debt markets)~$135 trillion
Broad money (M2)~$100 trillion
Gold (above ground)~$14–15 trillion
Private businesses, art, collectibles, etc.~$20–30 trillion (est.)


If even $273 trillion of that (stocks, real estate, bonds, money supply) flows into Bitcoin, that’s:

$273 trillion ÷ 21 million BTC = $13 million per coin

This isn’t speculation—it’s about monetary premium, the extra value people add to assets (like real estate or art) just because they don’t trust cash.

Bitcoin is absorbing that value because it’s better money.


🧠 Strategy: It’s Not Too Late

A $10,000 investment today could get you 0.1 BTC.
If Bitcoin hits $13 million, that’s worth $1.3 million.

Of course, you shouldn’t invest money you can’t afford to lose. But for many, $10K is a small bet with a big upside.

Bitcoin isn’t just about price—it’s about a fundamentally better way to store and transmit value.


🎯 Final Thought: We’re All Fish in Fiat Water

You’ve lived your whole life in a system where money loses value. It feels normal, but it’s not natural.

Bitcoin is a new kind of money: scarce, digital, decentralized, and global.

Once you understand what money really is, it becomes clear: Bitcoin is not just better money—it’s the future of value itself.

Post Labor Econonomics Videos – David Shapiro

Update 7-27-2025 – He added a 5th video Post-Labor Economics Lecture 05 – “Bridging the Gap” (2025 Update)

as well as a long podcast – Full Post-Labor Economics Deep Dive and Book Preview! Interview with Dalibor Petrovic

I am looking forward to the book.

original post below

Over the past couple weeks, I’ve been diving deep into David Shapiro’s Post-Labor Economics lecture series (linked below — all around 40 min). I’ve listened to each one twice, and then used a mix of ChatGPT, Copilot, and Grok to create four 10-point summaries — one per video. Then I asked ChatGPT to synthesize those into a single meta-summary of the core ideas.

Here are the 4 videos. Each about 40 minutes long. 

Post-Labor Economics Lecture 04 – “Day 1 Implementation & Solutions” (2025 Update) 

Post-Labor Economics Lecture 02 – “Economic Agency Paradox” (2025 update)

Post-Labor Economics Lecture 03 – “That which gets measured gets managed!” (2025 update)

Post-Labor Economics Lecture 04 – “Day 1 Implementation & Solutions” (2025 Update)

ChatGPT – Here is a 10-bullet-point meta-summary that synthesizes the key themes and insights from all four “Post-Labor Economics” video summaries:

  1. Automation is Inevitable and Transformative: AI and robotics are displacing human labor across all sectors, making wage-based employment increasingly obsolete while simultaneously threatening consumer demand and economic stability.
  2. Economic Agency is the Core Concern: Individuals require labor rights, property ownership, and voting rights to retain agency. As labor rights erode, property rights become the cornerstone of financial autonomy.
  3. The Demand Paradox: Businesses want to automate to cut costs but still need paying customers. Without jobs, people can’t spend—creating a structural contradiction that leads to economic collapse unless resolved.
  4. Rethinking Metrics: The EAI: Traditional KPIs like GDP and unemployment are no longer sufficient. The Economic Agency Index (EAI) measures household income sources (property, wages, transfers) and highlights the need to prioritize ownership income.
  5. UBI: Helpful but Not Enough: Universal Basic Income is necessary as a safety net but inadequate on its own due to inflation risk, governance issues, and centralization. It must be paired with decentralized, property-based income streams.
  6. Ownership is the New Wages: Future economic resilience depends on expanding access to trusts, wealth funds, co-ops, patron equity programs, and digital tokens to replace lost labor income with ownership-based dividends.
  7. Counties as Innovation Labs: With 3,100 U.S. counties, local governments are ideal sites for experimenting with and scaling post-labor economic models, offering granular data and tailored policy solutions.
  8. Banks as Economic Interfaces: Banks will evolve into the primary economic hubs, managing dividend flows, investment portfolios, and identity verification, replacing the role of traditional employers in financial life.
  9. Guardrails Against Technofeudalism: Preventing elite capture and concentrated corporate control is critical. Transparency, participatory governance, and broad-based ownership are essential safeguards.
  10. Market-Driven, Not Ideological: Post-labor economics distinguishes itself from socialism and communism by preserving markets and private property. Its goal is not wealth redistribution through state control, but wealth inclusion through distributed ownership and market-based tools.

I continued to have a conversation with ChatGPT to understand further. 

I asked it “”How does post-labor economics differ from individuals simply investing in the stock market to generate passive income?”

It gave a very nicely formatted response, below. 


🧩 TL;DR: It’s Not Either/Or

Buying stocks is one tool — a good one — for individual financial freedom.

But post-labor economics is about designing an entire economy where capital income is as normal, widespread, and accessible as having a job once was.

It’s not just you winning the game — it’s everyone getting a seat at the table.

Great question — and an important one.

🤔 At first glance, post-labor economics might sound like:

“Just buy stocks and live off dividends — problem solved.”

But post-labor economics goes beyond that in a few key ways. Here’s how it’s different from individuals simply investing in the stock market:


🏛️ 1. System Design vs. Personal Strategy

  • Stock investing is an individual solutionyou build capital and income for yourself.
  • Post-labor economics is a system-wide redesign — it’s about building structures where everyone can participate in ownership, even if they don’t have savings, brokerage accounts, or financial literacy.

💵 2. Barriers to Entry

  • The stock market requires:
    • Disposable income
    • Access to financial tools
    • Risk tolerance
    • Education
  • Post-labor models focus on lowering those barriers by:
    • Distributing residency-based dividends
    • Creating local trust funds
    • Offering non-transferable community equity (you don’t have to “buy in”)

🏘️ 3. Ownership of Local, Tangible Assets

  • The stock market mostly involves ownership of national or global corporations.
  • Post-labor economics emphasizes ownership of local assets: businesses, land, water rights, data, energy — things that create direct, community-level income streams.

Owning Amazon stock ≠ owning the gas station, solar field, or rental housing in your own town.


🤝 4. Shared Governance & Resilience

  • When you buy stock, you have no governance power, unless you’re a billionaire activist investor.
  • Post-labor structures are built on shared governance — resident voting, dividend boards, and community stewardship.

💬 5. Not Everyone Can or Will Invest

  • A huge portion of the population has no stock market exposure. About 45% of Americans own no equities at all — and among the bottom 50% of income, it’s more like 10–15%.
  • Post-labor economics seeks to bake ownership into the system so that even non-investors receive income from capital.

🧠 6. Ownership as Policy, Not Privilege

  • Stock investing is optional and personal.
  • Post-labor economics treats ownership as infrastructure — like roads or clean water. It should be available to all by design, not just those who planned ahead or got lucky.

🌐 7. Resisting Elite Capture

  • The stock market concentrates wealth — the top 10% own over 85% of equities.
  • Post-labor models try to decentralize ownership — giving communities a stake in the economy before everything gets bought up by private equity or mega-corps.

🛠️ 8. Designed for the Age of Automation

  • Stock market investing was never intended as a wage replacement for the masses.
  • Post-labor economics is explicitly built to answer:

“What happens when jobs disappear, but people still need income?”

My next question. 

“What mechanisms does post-labor economics use to avoid the tragedy of the commons when assets are collectively owned?”

✅ TL;DR:

Post-labor economics avoids the tragedy of the commons by turning shared access into structured, incentivized, accountable co-ownership.

It’s not a free-for-all — it’s a designed economy, where people are rewarded for taking care of what they collectively own.

Excellent question — and one of the core design challenges of post-labor economics.

The tragedy of the commons refers to a situation where a shared resource is overused or neglected because no one feels personal responsibility. In a post-labor economy — where ownership is distributed rather than concentrated — this is a real risk. But it’s not unsolvable.

Here’s how post-labor economics intentionally designs around the tragedy of the commons:


🧩 1. Move from “Common” to “Co-Owned”

  • The key shift is from open access (commons) to structured, governed co-ownership.
  • Think: community trusts, resident shares, dividend boards — where everyone has skin in the game, not just access.

📜 2. Define Clear Rights and Responsibilities

  • Successful post-labor models include smart governance charters:
    • Who can vote?
    • Who maintains assets?
    • How are profits used?
    • What happens if you leave?
  • This clarity prevents freeloading and aligns incentives for stewardship.

💰 3. Tie Participation to Rewards

  • Dividends aren’t just handed out — they can be tied to local contribution:
    • Show up to meetings
    • Volunteer hours
    • Local residency
    • Use the service or shop locally
  • This ensures that ownership feels earned, not distant or abstract.

📊 4. Transparency and Dashboards

  • Many models propose using public dashboards to show how community-owned assets are performing.
  • When people see the numbers — usage, revenue, maintenance costs — it creates accountability and pride.

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 5. Decentralized Governance Structures

  • Rather than one central authority, post-labor systems push decisions downward:
    • Counties manage their own trusts
    • Co-ops elect local boards
    • Banks help automate compliance and distribution
  • Local control = stronger stewardship.

🏦 6. Hybrid Ownership Models

  • Some assets are shared (like land or solar arrays), while others are individually owned (tokens, local equity).
  • This creates a blended structure where people benefit both as individuals and collectively, reducing the temptation to abuse shared goods.

🛡️ 7. Guardrails Against Elite Capture

  • Ironically, many “commons” in the modern economy (like housing or water) have already been captured — just not by the public.
  • Post-labor models bake in protections: voting caps, local-only ownership, anti-speculation rules, etc.

It’s a powerful framework. Personally, I’m still focused on achieving my own financial freedom — and I encourage everyone to do the same. But once we secure our own foundations, we’re in a much better position to help build a freer, more equitable world for everyone.

The Intellectual Stagnation in Academia: Ignoring the Corporate Shift to Bitcoin

Introduction In recent years, the corporate world has witnessed a historic shift in treasury strategies, with several prominent companies incorporating Bitcoin into their reserves. Despite these significant changes, many finance professors continue to dismiss or ignore the implications of this trend. During my MBA studies, I have personally discussed or emailed with six finance professors over the last three years about Bitcoin. None of them have shown any curiosity or willingness to engage in meaningful discussions about this topic. While I cannot speak for all finance professors, this has been my experience with those I have interacted with. This paper aims to highlight the lack of intellectual curiosity among academics in the face of obvious transformations in corporate and global environments.

The Corporate Shift to Bitcoin The adoption of Bitcoin by companies such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Block Inc. marks a pivotal change in how corporate treasuries manage their assets. These companies view Bitcoin as a strategic asset, providing a hedge against inflation and currency debasement. MicroStrategy, for instance, has aggressively acquired Bitcoin, making it the largest Bitcoin treasury in the world. This trend began around 2020 and has continued to gain traction, signaling a shift in corporate treasury management.

In the last month, several other companies have also announced Bitcoin treasury strategies:

  • Genius Group: An AI-powered education group that has committed 90% or more of its current and future reserves to be held in Bitcoin 1.
  • Worksport: A U.S.-based provider of pickup truck solutions that is adding cryptocurrency to its corporate treasury strategy 1.
  • Rumble: A video platform targeting a conservative audience, planning to invest up to $20 million of surplus cash in Bitcoin 2.
  • Metaplanet: A company with clearly stated strategy reserve asset goals and reasoning 3.
  • Strategy (previously MicroStrategy): Continues to lead the way with its Bitcoin treasury strategy 3.

Government Recognition of Bitcoin The U.S. government has also acknowledged the significance of Bitcoin by establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile. This move underscores the growing acceptance of Bitcoin as a store of value and its potential role in national economic strategies.

Personal Experience with Academic Dismissal Over the past three years, I have personally discussed or emailed with six finance professors during my MBA studies about the topic of Bitcoin. Despite the clear and significant changes in corporate treasury strategies, none of these professors have shown any curiosity or willingness to engage in meaningful discussions about Bitcoin. This lack of interest is particularly surprising given the relevance of Bitcoin to contemporary financial practices and corporate strategies and the fact that there are not many innovations in Corporate Treasury operations. When a new idea comes along you would expect people to be interested to consider if it has any value.

The Importance of Intellectual Curiosity Intellectual curiosity is a cornerstone of academic excellence. It drives innovation, fosters critical thinking, and encourages the exploration of new ideas. The reluctance of finance professors to engage with the topic of Bitcoin reflects a stagnation in intellectual curiosity that is detrimental to both students and the broader academic community.

Conclusion The corporate shift to Bitcoin represents a significant change in treasury strategies that warrants academic attention. Professors should embrace intellectual curiosity and explore the implications of this trend, rather than dismissing it. By doing so, they can provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the evolving financial landscape and prepare them for the future.

Essay: Why Gary Stevenson Should Rethink Bitcoin

@garyseconomics

Gary, your crusade against inequality is spot-on—the rich hoard wealth, wages stagnate, and housing slips out of reach. You’ve nailed how the system’s rigged, profiting off disparity as you did at Citibank. But your dismissal of Bitcoin as a “scam” or “musical chairs” misses its point. Let’s break it down through your lens. You see value in what’s tangible—property, bonds, cash flows. Bitcoin’s different: it’s digital scarcity, forged by energy-intensive mining, not free “points on the internet.” It costs real resources—miners burn electricity rivaling small nations to secure it. That’s not hype; that’s a backbone. You’ve said wealth concentration tanks demand, keeping rates low. Bitcoin flips that script. It’s not controlled by banks or governments printing money for the elite—it’s capped at 21 million coins, a hedge against inflation you’ve seen erode workers’ lives. You fear Satoshi’s a shadowy puppetmaster, selling off a million coins to dupe the masses. Check the blockchain—those wallets haven’t moved in 16 years. No secret dump, no conspiracy. Bitcoin’s transparent; anyone can verify it. You’d spot a scam in derivatives a mile away—apply that here. It’s not a rich man’s toy; it’s open to anyone with a phone, from East London to Lagos, leveling a field you know is uneven. You’re right about speculative bubbles, but Bitcoin’s survived crashes—$20K in 2017 to $3K, now thriving in 2025 with institutional buy-in. It’s not about quick riches; it’s a store of value, like digital gold, for a world you’ve seen fail the poor. You’ve bet against broken systems before. Bitcoin’s a bet for one—decentralized, fair, and tough as nails. Give it a trader’s eye, Gary. It’s not the enemy; it’s a tool.

@satmojoe

@Jcastweet

@PeterMcCormack

@HawkMcFlipster

@Oriflamme87