Members of Congress have long faced accusations of trading on insider information — buying and selling stocks in companies they help regulate.
It’s a bipartisan problem: Republicans and Democrats alike have profited from privileged access and timing the rest of the public could never match.
That’s not just bad optics — it’s corruption.
It undermines faith in both the markets and the integrity of government.
To highlight how deep this problem goes, I’ve started an experiment tracking three ETFs:
- NANC — the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF, built around stocks traded by Democratic lawmakers.
- GOP — the Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF, reflecting trades made by Republican lawmakers.
- SPY — the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, serving as a neutral market benchmark.
My goal isn’t to glorify these funds — it’s to show in real numbers how political trading compares to the broad market, and to call out why this system needs reform.
Policy Context
This issue connects directly to Senator Josh Hawley’s proposal to ban individual stock trading by members of Congress.
His bill wouldn’t ban investing altogether — lawmakers could still own broad mutual funds or ETFs, just not trade individual stocks that might be affected by their votes.
That distinction matters. It allows long-term wealth building without the appearance or reality of insider trading.
📎 Read Hawley’s bill here
Performance Snapshot (Feb 10 2023 → Oct 27 2025)
| Symbol | ETF Name | Description | Starting Price* | Current Price | Total Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANC | Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | Tracks stocks favored by Democratic members of Congress | $24.69 | $46.15 | +86.9% |
| GOP | Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF | Tracks stocks favored by Republican members of Congress | $24.96 | $37.20 | +49.0% |
| SPY | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | Baseline for overall U.S. market | $408 | $685 | +67.9% |
*Starting prices from Google Finance (Feb 10 2023, ETF inception date). Current prices as of Oct 27 2025.
The Takeaway
Both “political ETFs” have gained since launch, but that doesn’t justify congressional trading.
When lawmakers can personally profit from decisions they influence, public trust erodes — no matter how well the market performs.
This experiment is my small way to expose how close politics and profit have become — and to advocate for a system where leadership means stewardship, not stock tips.