1% Allocation to Bitcoin – An Asymmetric Bet

Bitcoin represents an asymmetric bet. It is one of the few assets that has the potential to 50x.

I think it’s smart to invest 1% of your net worth into bitcoin. If you have $100k in investable assets in your 401k or bank account, you could consider buying $1,000 worth of Bitcoin. With Bitcoin costing $29,749.64 for 1 bitcoin as I’m writing this $1,000 would get you 0.03302561. If bitcoin was to hit $100k that’d be worth $3,302. If Bitcoin goes to $1 million/coin you’d have $33,025.

Once you accumulate a higher net worth you can actually bet a larger amount to bitcoin, say 2%-5%. The reason is you have the safety of your core position of assets in case your asymmetric bet goes poorly. If your core position is $500k and you invest $5k or even $10k, in the chance your asymmetric bet goes to $0 you still have $490k in your core position, which is still a strong position to be in. 

Nassim Nicholas Taleb shares the concept of asymmetric bets. Safe/low risk positions in your investments act as an anchor while as well as big/high risk investments give you the opportunity to “hit it big”. Bitcoin would fall into this big payoff/high risk category. 


But as noted, if you have a very safe base of index funds as your safe/low risk position, it might make sense to take some risk, but only with what you are willing to lose! Most people think they are willing to take more risk than they actually are. Once a position drops 50% people often sell. You need to consider what you will do if your asymmetric bet drops 50% BEFORE it happens. If your answer is “sell” the asymmetric bet probably wasn’t something you should have done in the first place!. If the answer is buy, and you are sure you will do that, perhaps you should consider the asymmetric bet. Personally this is the position I was in all of 2022. I was buying bitcoin all the way from $60k down to $15k. It is now at $29k and I am just a little in the green, but at the start of 2023 I was 50% in the negative on my bitcoin holdings!

The majority of my personal portfolio is invested in safe index funds. But I do have 2 potential asymmetric bets with a smaller portion of my portfolio, Tesla and Bitcoin. 

If you’d like to learn more about bitcoin you can read plenty of my posts. 

Nobody Wants to Buy Bitcoin… Yet

Bitcoin Vs. Cryptocurrencies

What Problem Does Bitcoin Solve?

KPMG – The Bitcoin Narrative is Changing

Abigail Disney

Abigail Disney (Disney Heiress worth $120 million) thinks that governments should tax the rich more. I guess the assumption is that then the government would do “good” with that money? But would they? Data says that giving money to people directly often is much better than having “someone else” decide what is best for them. 

There are multiple examples of this

The Finnish Experiment 

California Program Giving $500 No-Strings-Attached Stipends Pays Off, Study Finds

So, instead of deciding what is good for others, why doesn’t she embark on a personal redistribution? I proposed a similar, self funded, basic income idea to Mark Zuckerburg in 2017. He never took me up on that. 
Here is the basic setup.

$30k/year*500 people =$15 million *5 years = Cost of program $75 million over 5 years.

Since Abigail is worth $120 million and has rising stock, she will likely come out with over $75 million at the end of the project!

I am sure someone in Stockton who did this project would be happy to take some money to fund a larger project. 

Or I am sure Andrew Yang would be happy to help facilitate such a project. 
We are waiting for a large donor to step up and fund such a large scale, long term project. 

Be a leader Abigail.